Hi Nishanth,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 12:42:04PM GMT, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 16:39-20241012, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > The possible wakeup devices are found by checking which devices are
> > powered by the regulator supplying the "vddshv_canuart" line. These are
> > considered possible wakeup sources. Only wakeup sources that are
> > actually enabled by the user will be considered as a an active wakeup
> > source. If none of the wakeup sources are enabled the system will do a
> > normal poweroff. If at least one wakeup source is enabled it will
> > instead send a TI_SCI_MSG_PREPARE_SLEEP message from the sys_off
> > handler. Sending this message will result in an immediate shutdown of
> > the system. No execution is expected after this point. The code will
> > wait for 5s and do an emergency_restart afterwards if Partial-IO wasn't
> > entered at that point.
> >
> [...]
>
> > +static bool tisci_canuart_wakeup_enabled(struct ti_sci_info *info)
> > +{
> > + static const char canuart_name[] = "vddshv_canuart";
> > + struct device_node *wakeup_node = NULL;
> > +
> > + for (wakeup_node = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, "vio-supply");
> > + wakeup_node;
> > + wakeup_node = of_find_node_with_property(wakeup_node, "vio-supply")) {
> > + struct device_node *supply_node;
> > + const char *supply_name;
> > + struct platform_device *pdev;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + supply_node = of_parse_phandle(wakeup_node, "vio-supply", 0);
> > + if (!supply_node)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_string(supply_node, "regulator-name", &supply_name);
> > + of_node_put(supply_node);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_warn(info->dev, "Failed to parse vio-supply phandle at %pOF %d\n",
> > + wakeup_node, ret);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (strncmp(canuart_name, supply_name, strlen(canuart_name)))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + pdev = of_find_device_by_node(wakeup_node);
> > + if (!pdev)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
> > + dev_dbg(info->dev, "%pOF identified as wakeup source for Partial-IO\n",
> > + wakeup_node);
> > + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> > + of_node_put(wakeup_node);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
>
> What is the binding that supports this? I just do not think that
> scanning the entire tree for vio-supply implies you will get thr right
> property here.
>
> Just giving an example to illustrate this point:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ti,wl1251.txt says it
> needs vio-supply -> so i have a node with the wireless supply as
> vio-supply -> Since we are scanning from NULL for vio-supply, we hit
> that, that is a bad choice for enabling io-retention.
There is no bining that specifically supports this as I think it is not
needed. The devices that are capable to wakeup the system from
Partial-IO are all powered through one supply line that is always-on. It
is called 'vddshv_canuart' and the name of this supply is checked
in the above code as well. Yes I am using 'vio-supply', but only to
search for the potential consumers of this supply.
So wl1251 will be skipped in above code at
if (strncmp(canuart_name, supply_name, strlen(canuart_name)))
Best
Markus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
