Hi Kishon,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 08:56:54PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 March 2015 05:04 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> >On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 04:33:02PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 05:36:29 AM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> >>>Add a driver for the USB PHY on the Conexant CX92755 SoC, from the
> >>>Digicolor series of SoCs. The PHY is connected to the on-chip chipidea
> >>>usb2 host.
> >>>
> >>>The hardware is somewhat similar to the phy-mxs-usb.c usb_phy, but it is
> >>>different enough to merit its own driver. Also, this driver uses the
> >>>generic phy infrastructure.
> >>
> >>the register set looks very similar to MXS one indeed. How is it different
> >>please ?
> >
> >Almost of the bits that are defined in the MXS USBPHY_CTRL register are not
> >defined in the Digicolor one. Some have different meaning, and some are
> >reserved. OTOH, the Digicolor USBPHY_CTRL register uses all bits in the 1-13
> >range. Also, the Digicolor phy does not have anatop registers.
>
> I think we should try adding support for this in the same driver.
The only code that can actually be shared between the driver is the two lines
usb_phy .on_connect callback routine. The init sequence that takes most of the
digicolor driver is totally different. Using a single driver for both PHYs
does not make much sense, IMHO.
Besides, phy-mxs-usb.c uses the deprecated usb_phy framework. So we first need
to port this driver to the generic phy framework.
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
