On 18/10/2024 11:12, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
>>> ```
>>>
>>>
>>> How do I set #address-cells in example-0 to 2?
>>> I guess that is the problem.
>>
>>
>>
>> You just set it... There are dozens/hundreds of schemas doing it, what
>> is exactly a problem here?
>
> I think I will solve the problem by including the parent nodes.
Just like everyone else or some other way?
> What do you think about this?
>
> examples:
> - |
> aemif: aemif@68000000 {
> compatible = "ti,da850-aemif";
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
>
> reg = <0x68000000 0x00008000>;
> ranges = <0 0 0x60000000 0x08000000
> 1 0 0x68000000 0x00008000>;
> clocks = <&psc0 3>;
> clock-names = "aemif";
> clock-ranges;
That's some other way, so no, drop unrelated properties. Look how all
other bindings are doing it - you need some wrapper node.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
