Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: clock: qcom-rpmhcc: Add RPMHCC bindings for SM8750

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:03:53PM -0700, Melody Olvera wrote:
> From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add bindings and update documentation for clock rpmh driver on SM8750
> SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18

This applies to all your patches.

There is already CXO clock, so why pad is needed? All of these clocks
come via some pad, right? Commit msg could explain here this. Otherwise
it just duplicates the diff.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux