Re: [PATCH 3/6] soc: mediatek: pwrap: Add support for MT6735 and MT6328 SoC/PMIC pair

[Yassine Oudjana <yassine.oudjana@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Oct 21 2024 at 15:25:00 +02:00:00, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
<angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Il 18/10/24 10:10, Yassine Oudjana ha scritto:
> > From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add register definitions and configuration for the MT6735 SoC and the
> > MT6328 PMIC which are commonly paired and communicate through the 
> > PMIC
> > wrapper.
> >
> > Note that the PMIC wrapper on MT6735M has a slightly different 
> > register
> > map and is therefore NOT compatible with MT6735.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 251 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 248 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c 
> > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > index 9fdc0ef792026..b9e8dd2a5999d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >    * Copyright (c) 2014 MediaTek Inc.
> >    * Author: Flora Fu, MediaTek
> >    */
> > +
> >   #include <linux/clk.h>
> >   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >   #include <linux/io.h>
> > @@ -100,7 +101,7 @@ enum dew_regs {
> >   	PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_MODE,
> >   	PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_SWRST,
> >   -	/* MT6323 only regs */
> > +	/* MT6323 and MT6328 only regs */
> >   	PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_EN,
> >   	PWRAP_DEW_RDDMY_NO,
> >   @@ -121,8 +122,10 @@ enum dew_regs {
> >   	PWRAP_RG_SPI_CON13,
> >   	PWRAP_SPISLV_KEY,
> >   -	/* MT6359 only regs */
> > +	/* MT6359 and MT6328 only regs */
> >   	PWRAP_DEW_CRC_SWRST,
> > +
> > +	/* MT6359 only regs */
> >   	PWRAP_DEW_RG_EN_RECORD,
> >   	PWRAP_DEW_RECORD_CMD0,
> >   	PWRAP_DEW_RECORD_CMD1,
> > @@ -171,6 +174,23 @@ static const u32 mt6323_regs[] = {
> >   	[PWRAP_DEW_RDDMY_NO] =		0x01a4,
> >   };
> >   +static const u32 mt6328_regs[] = {
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_DIO_EN] =		0x02d4,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST] =		0x02d6,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_WRITE_TEST] =	0x02d8,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_CRC_SWRST] =		0x02da,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_CRC_EN] =		0x02dc,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_CRC_VAL] =		0x02de,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_MON_GRP_SEL] =	0x02e0,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_KEY_SEL] =	0x02e2,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_IV_SEL] =	0x02e4,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_EN] =		0x02e6,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_RDY] =	0x02e8,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_MODE] =	0x02ea,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_SWRST] =	0x02ec,
> > +	[PWRAP_DEW_RDDMY_NO] =		0x02ee,
> > +};
> > +
> >   static const u32 mt6331_regs[] = {
> >   	[PWRAP_DEW_DIO_EN] =		0x018c,
> >   	[PWRAP_DEW_READ_TEST] =		0x018e,
> > @@ -394,7 +414,7 @@ enum pwrap_regs {
> >   	PWRAP_ADC_RDATA_ADDR1,
> >   	PWRAP_ADC_RDATA_ADDR2,
> >   -	/* MT7622 only regs */
> > +	/* MT7622 and MT6735 only regs */
> >   	PWRAP_STA,
> >   	PWRAP_CLR,
> >   	PWRAP_DVFS_ADR8,
> > @@ -417,6 +437,8 @@ enum pwrap_regs {
> >   	PWRAP_ADC_RDATA_ADDR,
> >   	PWRAP_GPS_STA,
> >   	PWRAP_SW_RST,
> > +
> > +	/* MT7622 only regs */
> >   	PWRAP_DVFS_STEP_CTRL0,
> >   	PWRAP_DVFS_STEP_CTRL1,
> >   	PWRAP_DVFS_STEP_CTRL2,
> > @@ -481,6 +503,50 @@ enum pwrap_regs {
> >   	/* MT8516 only regs */
> >   	PWRAP_OP_TYPE,
> >   	PWRAP_MSB_FIRST,
> > +
> > +	/* MT6735 only regs */
> > +	PWRAP_WACS3_EN,
> > +	PWRAP_INIT_DONE3,
> > +	PWRAP_WACS3_CMD,
> > +	PWRAP_WACS3_RDATA,
> > +	PWRAP_WACS3_VLDCLR,
>
> Are you sure that you need the PWRAP_MD_ADC_xxxx registers in here?
>
> Since MD is relatively big on its own, I'm not sure how to proceed 
> here.. it may
> make sense to split the MD part to a different array, or it may 
> not... I do need
> to understand what's going on.
>
> Can you please point me at some reference code to look at, so that I 
> can understand
> the situation a bit?
>
> Besides, I'm noticing that the "MD_ADC_RDATA_ADDR_R(x)" are 
> sequential registers
> and that's on more than just MT6735: instead of having 32 more 
> entries, it might
> make more sense to set only the first and declare the number (or 
> size) of regs...
>
> Something like:
>
> enum pwrap_regs {
> 	.....
> 	PWRAP_MD_ADC_RDATA_ADDR_LATEST,
> 	PWRAP_MD_ADC_RDATA_ADDR_WP,
> 	PWRAP_MD_ADC_RDATA_ADDR_R0,
> 	PWRAP_MD_ADC_STA0,
> 	PWRAP_MD_ADC_STA1,
> 	PWRAP_MD_ADC_STA2
> };
>
> static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt6735 = {
> 	.regs = mt6735_regs,
> 	.num_md_addr = 32,
> 	[other stuff]
> };
>
> ...but again, please, if you can point me at an implementation that 
> actually
> uses the R(x) registers, that'd be better ... so that we can choose 
> the best
> option to add those in there.
>
> Everything else is great: good job :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Angelo

I just defined all the registers I could find. We aren't using them for 
anything yet so it's also fine to keep them out for now.

It seems that in the downstream kernel they are only initialized once 
and never accessed again. This is the only place I could find where 
they are accessed:
https://gitlab.com/Tooniis/linux-samsung-grandpplte/-/blob/master/drivers/misc/mediatek/pmic_wrap/mt6735/pwrap_hal.c#L1254-1290