On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:23:54AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:43:18AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > + > > +description: | > > + The Inside Secure SafeXcel EIP-93 is a cryptographic engine IP block > > + integrated in varios devices with very different and generic name from > > + PKTE to simply vendor+EIP93. The real IP under the hood is actually > > + developed by Inside Secure and given to license to vendors. > > + > > + The IP block is sold with different model based on what feature are > > + needed and are identified with the final letter. Each letter correspond > > + to a specific set of feature and multiple letter reflect the sum of the > > + feature set. > > You write it is licensed to vendors, so are you sure these could be > used alone, without vendor customizations/hookups etc? I think you > should have a dedicated, SoC-specific compatible in the front. I am not > sure if this was discussed already, though. Probably should, but some reason we haven't on other Inside Secure IP. Perhaps they are just simple enough from a DT perspective to get away without. Also, there may not be any SoC associated with some of these. If there is an SoC, then better to add a compatible to help avoid any future DT changes. Rob
