On 10/17/24 1:16 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 10/16/24 7:26 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:20:51AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
The IOMUXC controller description is almost identical on i.MX35/5x/6
SoCs,
except for the configuration bits which differ across SoCs. Rename the
fsl,imx6ul-pinctrl.yaml to fsl,imx35-pinctrl.yaml, fill in compatible
strings for the other SoCs and fill in the various bits into desciption.
This way, i.MX35/5x/6 series SoCs can all be converted to YAML DT.
Remove
the old text DT bindings description.
Just a nit, but I prefer 'DT schema' over using 'YAML DT' or just
'YAML'. YAML is just the file format we use and YAML is a lot of things
that's not DT schema including other uses/attempts with DT.
Fixed in V2 and also in the LTC3676 conversion, thanks.
This generates lots of warnings (patchwork has the output) for pincfg
nodes which don't match 'grp$' node name convention. Do we really want
to "fix" all of those?
I had a look and many of those are simple, so I would say yes.
We could allow anything, but then we don't
enforce anything on new stuff.
We do enforce grp$ on iMX8M , it just wasn't enforced on old DTs yet.
Or this could be split between new and
old platforms. If we decide to fix any old ones, then just have to move
them to the "new" schema.
Strictly speaking, iMX6 and older are all old platforms, but I think it
should be easy to fix them up.
So, it seems like fixing most of them DTs up wasn't that hard.
But I am worried I might've broken a few in the process. I guess users
will complain and then we fix them up ?
