Re: [PATCH v3 02/15] drm/rockchip: Set dma mask to 64 bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-09-20 9:20 am, Andy Yan wrote:
From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The vop mmu support translate physical address upper 4 GB to iova
below 4 GB. So set dma mask to 64 bit to indicate we support address
4GB.

This can avoid warnging message like this on some boards with DDR
4 GB:

rockchip-drm display-subsystem: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 266240 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 130 (slots)
rockchip-drm display-subsystem: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 266240 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 0 (slots)
rockchip-drm display-subsystem: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 266240 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 130 (slots)
rockchip-drm display-subsystem: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 266240 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 130 (slots)
rockchip-drm display-subsystem: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 266240 bytes), total 32768 (slots), used 0 (slots)

There are several things wrong with this...

AFAICS the VOP itself still only supports 32-bit addresses, so the VOP driver should only be setting a 32-bit DMA mask. The IOMMUs support either 32-bit or 40-bit addresses, and the IOMMU driver does set its DMA mask appropriately. None of those numbers is 64, so that's clearly suspicious already. Plus it would seem the claim of the IOMMU being able to address >4GB isn't strictly true for RK3288 (which does supposedly support 8GB of RAM).

Furthermore, the "display-subsystem" doesn't even exist - it does not represent any actual DMA-capable hardware, so it should not have a DMA mask, and it should not be used for DMA API operations. Buffers for the VOP should be DMA-mapped for the VOP device itself. At the very least, the rockchip_gem_alloc_dma() path is clearly broken otherwise (I guess this patch possibly *would* make that brokenness apparent).

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Derek Foreman <derek.foreman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

(no changes since v1)

  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
index 04ef7a2c3833..8bc2ff3b04bb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
@@ -445,7 +445,9 @@ static int rockchip_drm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  		return ret;
  	}
- return 0;
+	ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));

Finally as a general thing, please don't misuse dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() in platform drivers, just use normal dma_set_mask_and_coherent(). The platform bus code has been initialising the dev->dma_mask pointer for years now, drivers should not be messing with it any more.

Thanks,
Robin.

+
+	return ret;
  }
static void rockchip_drm_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux