On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 10:05:40PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Florian, > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 07:56:01PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > This patch series updates the pwm-brcmstb driver to not assume an > > open-drain mode, but instead get that sort of configuration from Device > > Tree using the 'open-drain' property. > > Just for me to be sure to understand correctly: A kernel without your > patch #2 behaves identical to a kernel with that patch if the open-drain > property is present, right? I don't think it does. Patch #2 breaks the ABI, IMO. > > It's not clear to me why totem-pole is the better default and the commit > logs don't justify the updated default. Can you improve here? > Best regards, Krzysztof
