Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: dt-bindings: Remove assigned-clock-* from various schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Krzysztof,

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:43:07AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 04:02:50PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/hynix,hi846.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/hynix,hi846.yaml
> > index 60f19e1152b33128cf3baa15b8c70a874ca6d52e..d18ead8f7fc43bfacc291aed85b5ca9166c46edb 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/hynix,hi846.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/hynix,hi846.yaml
> > @@ -28,12 +28,6 @@ properties:
> >      items:
> >        - description: Reference to the mclk clock.
> >  
> > -  assigned-clocks:
> > -    maxItems: 1
> > -
> > -  assigned-clock-rates:
> > -    maxItems: 1
> > -
> >    reset-gpios:
> >      description: Reference to the GPIO connected to the RESETB pin. Active low.
> >      maxItems: 1
> > @@ -82,8 +76,6 @@ required:
> >    - compatible
> >    - reg
> >    - clocks
> > -  - assigned-clocks
> > -  - assigned-clock-rates
> 
> That's not extraneous, but has a meaning that without assigned-clocks
> this device or driver will not operate.
> 
> File should rather stay as is.

...

> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx258.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx258.yaml
> > index c978abc0cdb35cfe2b85069946cf1be435a58cb8..f0f9726a2add89492b8c56e17ed607841baa3a0d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx258.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/sony,imx258.yaml
> > @@ -24,10 +24,6 @@ properties:
> >        - sony,imx258
> >        - sony,imx258-pdaf
> >  
> > -  assigned-clocks: true
> > -  assigned-clock-parents: true
> > -  assigned-clock-rates: true
> > -
> 
> This is ok.

Basically the clock related requirements for these devices are the same:
they all need a clock configured at a board specific frequency. Shouldn't
we treat them the same way?

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux