On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 05:51:15PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> The i.MX95 ENETC has been upgraded to revision 4.1, which is very
> different from the LS1028A ENETC (revision 1.0) except for the SI
> part. Therefore, the fsl-enetc driver is incompatible with i.MX95
> ENETC PF. So we developed the nxp-enetc4 driver for i.MX95 ENETC
> PF, and this driver will be used to support the ENETC PF with major
> revision 4 in the future.
>
> Currently, the nxp-enetc4 driver only supports basic transmission
> feature for i.MX95 ENETC PF, the more basic and advanced features
> will be added in the subsequent patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
...
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
...
> +static void enetc4_pf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct enetc_si *si;
> + struct enetc_pf *pf;
> +
> + si = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + pf = enetc_si_priv(si);
Hi Wei Fang,
pf is set but otherwise unused in this function. So I think that it, and
the call to enetc_si_priv() should probably be removed. They can be added
back if and when they are needed in subsequent patches.
> +
> + enetc4_pf_netdev_destroy(si);
> + enetc_pci_remove(pdev);
> +}
...
