On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 02:52:43PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/realtek,rtl9301-snand.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/realtek,rtl9301-snand.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..397b32b41e86 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/realtek,rtl9301-snand.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/spi/realtek,rtl9301-snand.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: SPI-NAND Flash Controller for Realtek RTL9300 SoCs > + > +maintainers: > + - Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +description: > + The Realtek RTL9300 SoCs have a built in SPI-NAND controller. It supports > + typical SPI-NAND page cache operations in single, dual or quad IO mode. > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - realtek,rtl9301-snand > + - realtek,rtl9302b-snand > + - realtek,rtl9302c-snand > + - realtek,rtl9303-snand All of them look compatible with each other, why not using fallback to 9301? That's common and expected pattern. Best regards, Krzysztof
