On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 16:45:40 +0200 Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 09:19 +0000, Guillaume Stols wrote: > > Since the pwm was introduced before backend, there was a mock use, with > > a GPIO emulation. Now that iio backend is introduced, the mock use can > > be removed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Maybe this was agreed on the previous iterations but I wonder if we shouldn't just > bring PWM support in the same patch as backend support is added... > I can't remember why we ended up in this position (might have been me who asked for it!) but I'm fine with the logical steps we have in the series, and it will all merge together. So probably not worth rethinking now! I took another look and other than the stuff Nuno has raised this series looks good to me. Figures crossed for v5 :) Jonathan > - Nuno Sá > > >
