On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:03:46PM +0300, Yassine Oudjana wrote: > From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml has different node name patterns which match > bindings of other MediaTek pin controllers, ref for pinmux-node.yaml which > has a description of the pinmux property, as well as some additional > descriptions for some pin configuration properties. Pull those changes > into mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml and adjust the example DTS to match in > preparation to combine the MT6795 document into it. > > Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml | 38 ++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml > index 3bbc00df5548d..352a88d7b135e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml > @@ -111,12 +111,12 @@ allOf: > - "#interrupt-cells" > > patternProperties: > - '-[0-9]*$': > + '-pins$': Worst case, this could be an ABI break. Best case, it's churn for mt6779. Is it worth unifying? Rob
