From: Priyanka Singh <priyanka.singh@xxxxxxx>
Fix undefined behavior caused by left-shifting a negative value in the
expression:
cap_high ^ (1 << (bad_data_bit - 32))
The variable `bad_data_bit` ranges from 0 to 63. When `bad_data_bit` is
less than 32, `bad_data_bit - 32` becomes negative, and left-shifting by a
negative value in C is undefined behavior.
Fix this by checking the range of `bad_data_bit` before performing the
shift.
Fixes: ea2eb9a8b620 ("EDAC, fsl-ddr: Separate FSL DDR driver from MPC85xx")
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Singh <priyanka.singh@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
index 7a9fb1202f1a0..ccc13c2adfd6f 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
@@ -338,11 +338,18 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
fsl_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
"Faulty ECC bit: %d\n", bad_ecc_bit);
- fsl_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
- "Expected Data / ECC:\t%#8.8x_%08x / %#2.2x\n",
- cap_high ^ (1 << (bad_data_bit - 32)),
- cap_low ^ (1 << bad_data_bit),
- syndrome ^ (1 << bad_ecc_bit));
+ if ((bad_data_bit > 0 && bad_data_bit < 32) && bad_ecc_bit > 0) {
+ fsl_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
+ "Expected Data / ECC:\t%#8.8x_%08x / %#2.2x\n",
+ cap_high, cap_low ^ (1 << bad_data_bit),
+ syndrome ^ (1 << bad_ecc_bit));
+ }
+ if (bad_data_bit >= 32 && bad_ecc_bit > 0) {
+ fsl_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
+ "Expected Data / ECC:\t%#8.8x_%08x / %#2.2x\n",
+ cap_high ^ (1 << (bad_data_bit - 32)),
+ cap_low, syndrome ^ (1 << bad_ecc_bit));
+ }
}
fsl_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
--
2.34.1
