Re: [PATCH 0/1] Add RV1126 compatible watchdog string

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/9/24 23:14, Karthikeyan Krishnasamy wrote:
This patch is introduces a watchdog compatible string for rockchip's
RV1126. I have already send this patch[1] in the series[2] but somehow
missed watchdog maintainers and list. So resending this patch alone
again from the series[2].

Signed-off-by: Karthikeyan Krishnasamy <karthikeyan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

- Link to patch: [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912142451.2952633-2-karthikeyan@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Link to series: [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912142451.2952633-1-karthikeyan@xxxxxxxxxxx

Karthikeyan Krishnasamy (1):
   dt-bindings: watchdog: rockchip: Add rockchip,rv1126-wdt string

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/snps,dw-wdt.yaml | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)


I am curious: More and more people send introduction patches for individual
patches. I don't see any value in it, the intro patch is not available
in patchwork, and thus the context is missing when trying to review the
patch from there. This makes reviews much more difficult if one doesn't
reply directly to the patch. It doesn't make any sense to me, yet people
do it more and more.

Where is it suggested to send introduction patches for single-patch series,
and what is the rationale ?

Thanks,
Guenter





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux