Il 09/10/24 18:52, Frank Wunderlich ha scritto:
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add mt7988a pinctrl node.
Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
- fix wrong alignment of reg values
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7988a.dtsi | 241 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 241 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7988a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7988a.dtsi
index c9649b815276..7e15934efe0b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7988a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7988a.dtsi
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <dt-bindings/clock/mediatek,mt7988-clk.h>
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
#include <dt-bindings/phy/phy.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h>
/ {
compatible = "mediatek,mt7988a";
@@ -105,6 +106,246 @@ clock-controller@1001e000 {
#clock-cells = <1>;
};
+ pio: pinctrl@1001f000 {
+ compatible = "mediatek,mt7988-pinctrl";
+ reg = <0 0x1001f000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x11c10000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x11d00000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x11d20000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x11e00000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x11f00000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
+ reg-names = "gpio", "iocfg_tr",
+ "iocfg_br", "iocfg_rb",
+ "iocfg_lb", "iocfg_tl", "eint";
+ gpio-controller;
+ #gpio-cells = <2>;
+ gpio-ranges = <&pio 0 0 84>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 225 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+
+ mdio0_pins: mdio0-pins {
+ mux {
+ function = "eth";
+ groups = "mdc_mdio0";
+ };
+
+ conf {
+ pins = "SMI_0_MDC", "SMI_0_MDIO";
+ drive-strength = <MTK_DRIVE_8mA>;
Please do *not* use the MTK_DRIVE_(x)mA definitions anymore.
Here it is `drive-strength = <8>`.
+ };
+ };
+
+ i2c0_pins: i2c0-g0-pins {
+ mux {
+ function = "i2c";
+ groups = "i2c0_1";
+ };
+ };
+
+ i2c1_pins: i2c1-g0-pins {
+ mux {
+ function = "i2c";
+ groups = "i2c1_0";
+ };
+ };
Whatever pin can be configured with one or multiple groups that can be different
must *not* be in the SoC dtsi, but rather in the *board* dts(i) file, as the wanted
configuration of those pins is *not* soc-specific but board-specific.
From a fast look, I can see that at least the I2C pins can be assigned to different
functions: for example, pins 15+16 can be either of i2c0_1, *or* u30_phy_i2c0, *or*
u32_phy_i2c0, *or* xfi_phy0_i2c1 ... or others, even.
Finally - I think that *most* of the muxing that you're declaring here must instead
go to your board specific devicetree and not in mt7988a.dtsi.
Cheers,
Angelo