> On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 05:51:15PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote: > > The i.MX95 ENETC has been upgraded to revision 4.1, which is very > > different from the LS1028A ENETC (revision 1.0) except for the SI > > part. Therefore, the fsl-enetc driver is incompatible with i.MX95 > > ENETC PF. So we developed the nxp-enetc4 driver for i.MX95 ENETC > So add new nxp-enetc4 driver for i.MX95 ENETC PF with > major revision 4. > > > PF, and this driver will be used to support the ENETC PF with major > > revision 4 in the future. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h > > index 97524dfa234c..7f1ea11c33a0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > > #include <net/xdp.h> > > > > #include "enetc_hw.h" > > +#include "enetc4_hw.h" > > > > #define ENETC_SI_ALIGN 32 > > > > +static inline bool is_enetc_rev1(struct enetc_si *si) > > +{ > > + return si->pdev->revision == ENETC_REV1; > > +} > > + > > +static inline bool is_enetc_rev4(struct enetc_si *si) > > +{ > > + return si->pdev->revision == ENETC_REV4; > > +} > > + > > Actually, I suggest you check features, instead of check version number. > This is mainly used to distinguish between ENETC v1 and ENETC v4 in the general interfaces. See enetc_ethtool.c. > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..e38ade76260b > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,761 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause) > > +/* Copyright 2024 NXP */ > > +#include <linux/unaligned.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/of_net.h> > > +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > > +#include <linux/clk.h> > > +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h> > > +#include <linux/fsl/netc_global.h> > > sort headers. > Sure > > +static int enetc4_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, > > + const struct pci_device_id *ent) > > +{ > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > + struct enetc_si *si; > > + struct enetc_pf *pf; > > + int err; > > + > > + err = enetc_pci_probe(pdev, KBUILD_MODNAME, sizeof(*pf)); > > + if (err) { > > + dev_err(dev, "PCIe probing failed\n"); > > + return err; > > use dev_err_probe() > Okay > > + } > > + > > + /* si is the private data. */ > > + si = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); > > + if (!si->hw.port || !si->hw.global) { > > + err = -ENODEV; > > + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't map PF only space!\n"); > > + goto err_enetc_pci_probe; > > + } > > + > > + err = enetc4_pf_struct_init(si); > > + if (err) > > + goto err_pf_struct_init; > > + > > + pf = enetc_si_priv(si); > > + err = enetc4_pf_init(pf); > > + if (err) > > + goto err_pf_init; > > + > > + pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev); > > + enetc_get_si_caps(si); > > + err = enetc4_pf_netdev_create(si); > > + if (err) > > + goto err_netdev_create; > > + > > + return 0; > > + > > +err_netdev_create: > > +err_pf_init: > > +err_pf_struct_init: > > +err_enetc_pci_probe: > > + enetc_pci_remove(pdev); > > you can use devm_add_action_or_reset() to remove these goto labels. > Subsequent patches will have corresponding processing for these labels, so I don't want to add too many devm_add_action_or_reset ().