Hello, On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 08:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 08/10/2024 23:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > Hello Aleksandrs, > > > > [Again in plain text] > > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 at 23:12, Aleksandrs Vinarskis > > <alex.vinarskis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Document the X1E80100-based Dell XPS 13 9345 laptop, platform > >> codenamed 'Tributo'/'Tributo R'. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex.vinarskis@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > >> index 5cb54d69af0b..7c01fe30dabc 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml > >> @@ -1058,6 +1058,7 @@ properties: > >> - items: > >> - enum: > >> - asus,vivobook-s15 > >> + - dell,xps13-9345 > >> - lenovo,yoga-slim7x > >> - microsoft,romulus13 > >> - microsoft,romulus15 > >> -- > >> 2.43.0 > > > > Tested-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan.schmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > How do you test bindings? Running static checks in kernel tree is the > same as compiling software and adding tested-by. I took the whole patchset in when testing it on the actual hardware, so I gave the tested-by for the whole series as well. That being said, the binding patch here does indeed not benefit from any on device testing. Feel free to drop it. regards Stefan Schmidt
