Hello Krzysztof,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 5:07 PM
> To: sunyeal.hong <sunyeal.hong@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Krzysztof Kozlowski'
> <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'Rob Herring' <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'Conor Dooley'
> <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'Alim Akhtar' <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Sylwester
> Nawrocki' <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Chanwoo Choi' <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> 'Michael Turquette' <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Stephen Boyd'
> <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: samsung: exynosautov920: add peric1, misc
> and hsi0/1 clock support
>
> On 07/10/2024 10:04, sunyeal.hong wrote:
> > Hello Krzysztof,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 8:36 PM
> >> To: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >> <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley
> >> <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> >> Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Chanwoo Choi
> >> <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> >> Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> linux- clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: samsung: exynosautov920: add peric1,
> >> misc and hsi0/1 clock support
> >>
> >> On 12/09/2024 12:38, Sunyeal Hong wrote:
> >>> Like CMU_PERIC1, this provides clocks for USI09 ~ USI17, USI_I2C and
> >> USI_I3C.
> >>> Like CMU_MISC, this provides clocks for MISC, GIC and OTP.
> >>> Like CMU_HSI0, this provides clocks for PCIE.
> >>> Like CMU_HSI1, this provides clocks for USB and MMC.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> static int __init exynosautov920_cmu_probe(struct platform_device
> >>> *pdev) {
> >>> const struct samsung_cmu_info *info; @@ -1154,6 +1431,19 @@ static
> >>> const struct of_device_id exynosautov920_cmu_of_match[] = {
> >>> {
> >>> .compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-cmu-peric0",
> >>> .data = &peric0_cmu_info,
> >>> + }, {
> >>> + .compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-cmu-peric1",
> >>> + .data = &peric1_cmu_info,
> >>> + }, {
> >>> + .compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-cmu-misc",
> >>> + .data = &misc_cmu_info,
> >>> + }, {
> >>> + .compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-cmu-hsi0",
> >>> + .data = &hsi0_cmu_info,
> >>> + }, {
> >>> + .compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-cmu-hsi1",
> >>> + .data = &hsi1_cmu_info,
> >>> + }, {
> >>
> >> This is unrelated change. Please rebase.
> >>
> > Could you please explain in more detail the comment mentioned above?
>
> You were growing this list, didn't you? Then adding sentinel is unrelated.
>
I have confirmed that the sentinel is being applied duplicately. I will send you a patch after fixing it.
Best Regards,
sunyeal
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
