On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 1:29 AM Karl Chan <exxxxkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There are some ipq5018 based device's firmware only can able to boot > arm32 but the pinctrl driver dont allow it to be compiled on > arm32.Therefore this patch needed for those devices. > > Signed-off-by: Karl Chan <exxxxkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (...) > - depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST > + depends on ARM || ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST Can we get some more context for this? Is this another one of those cases where the SoC is actually a 64bit core but vendors just choose to run it in 32bit mode because that is what they want or what is the reason here? AFAIK IPQ5018 is always Cortex-A53? I just want to know if this is something we should encourage or leave out-of-tree. Yours, Linus Walleij
