On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18 March 2015 at 06:10, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> something happened during the last cycle and an old version of the devfreq >>> driver was merged. >>> >>> This thread contains patches that bring it up to date to the last submitted >>> version and also incorporates the feedback that that version received, plus >>> some other small fixes and improvements that came up during rebase and >>> testing. >>> >>> These patches implement support for setting the rate of the EMC clock based on >>> stats collected from the ACTMON, a piece of hw in the Tegra124 that counts >>> memory accesses (among others). >>> >>> It depends on the following in-flight patches: >>> >>> * EMC driver: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1907035 >>> * CPUFreq driver: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1897078 >>> >>> I have pushed a branch here for testing: >>> >>> http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/log/?h=actmon-v6 >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Tomeu >>> >>> Tomeu Vizoso (8): >>> of: Add binding for NVIDIA Tegra ACTMON node >>> PM / devfreq: tegra: Update to v5 of the submitted patches >>> clk: tegra: Have EMC clock implement determine_rate() >>> PM / devfreq: tegra: Use clock rate constraints >>> PM / devfreq: tegra: remove operating-points >>> PM / devfreq: tegra: Set drvdata before enabling the irq >>> PM / devfreq: tegra: Enable interrupts after resuming the devfreq >>> monitor >>> ARM: tegra: Add Tegra124 ACTMON support >> >> Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> for all PM / devfreq patches (2, 4, 5, 6, 7) >> And merged in for-rc tree with a little modification. > > Thanks. Though that's fine with me, I was wondering if Mikko or > Alexandre would have any comments on the changes, even if they are > small regarding what they already reviewed. After a quick look I think I'm good with it. I will try to look in further detail. If there is anything wrong, we can fix it with fixup patches, since what has been merged is good stuff already! I guess it would now be interesting to look at the watermark support for devfreq. I am not sure if anything is happening to it? Arto? https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/5/262 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
