On 02/10/2024 12:31, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 10/2/24 10:24, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/2/24 10:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2024 09:51, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> Compatible property is likely also required property.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> That's a convention but not necessary, a no-op.
>>
>> But how do you identify device then?
>> Or are you saying that device description is valid even if there is no
>> compatible string?
>
> One more thing
> commit 524dfbc4e9fc ("dt-bindings: clock: si5351: convert to yaml") is showing
> that compatible property was required in txt file.
>
> -Required properties:
> -- compatible: shall be one of the following:
> - "silabs,si5351a" - Si5351a, QFN20 package
> - "silabs,si5351a-msop" - Si5351a, MSOP10 package
>
> I can update commit message to describe it too.
Devices do not work without compatible, so this is obvious... and like
said - it is already required, so the change is redundant. Does not
harm, though.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
