On 02/10/2024 10:24, Michal Simek wrote: > > > On 10/2/24 10:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 02/10/2024 09:51, Michal Simek wrote: >>> Compatible property is likely also required property. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> That's a convention but not necessary, a no-op. > > But how do you identify device then? > Or are you saying that device description is valid even if there is no > compatible string? No. I meant your change means nothing to the schema. It's a noop. Compatible is implied. Best regards, Krzysztof
