enum: [100, 400]
default: 100
â??â??instead of declaring its range. What do you think?
In patches v2 I used if (dev->bus_capacitance_pf == 400) {... } else {...}
and other statements in the driver code to indicate that the capacitance
can only be 400pf or not. Maybe this is a metaphor. I'm sorry that I
wasn't more explicit about the constraints.
> > +
> > + snps,clk-freq-optimized:
> > + description: >
> > + This property indicates whether the hardware input clock frequency
> is
> > + reduced by reducing the internal latency. This value is used to
> compute
> > + the tHIGH and tLOW periods for high speed mode.
> > + type: boolean
> > +
> > unevaluatedProperties: false
> >
> > required:
> > @@ -146,4 +161,13 @@ examples:
> > interrupts = <8>;
> > clocks = <&ahb_clk>;
> > };
> > + - |
> > + i2c@c5000000 {
> > + compatible = "snps,designware-i2c";
>
> Extend EXISTING example. Not add new example.
Should I insert these two properties into one or all existing examples?
Thanks & Regards
Michael
