On 20 March 2015 at 20:12, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, and that is an eventual goal I suppose, but the current list is > excessive and is most likely not currently relied on by any one. So I > don't just want to C&P the entire list into this binding immediately. > > I guess my plan looks like this: > > 1. add "nor-jedec" binding, to provide lowest common denominator binding > (this series) > > 2. stop adding to the m25p_ids[] table unless necessary (enabled by this > series) > > 3. gauge whether we can remove certain entries from m25p_ids[] (e.g., if > they were only used in platform_data, not DT; or if they were very > recently added just to synchronize with spi-nor.c) Why we can't remove (slowly) all entries from m25p_ids that don't need any extra handling? If we'll have DT with "spansion,m25p80", "nor-jedec" and then m25p80.c will handle both: "m25p80" and "nor-jedec" without any difference, what's the point of keeping "m25p80" entry? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
