On 01/10/2024 07:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: csiphy0
+ - const: csiphy1
+ - const: csiphy2
+ - const: vfe0
+ - const: csid0
+ - const: vfe1
+ - const: csid1
+ - const: vfe_lite
+ - const: csid2
Why this order is so different than all others? This is supposed to
match other devices. Look at sdm845 for example.
These are appearing in address order, which is preferred over reg-name
ordering AFAIU.
+ reg = <0 0x0ac65000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x0ac66000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x0ac67000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x0acaf000 0 0x4000>,
+ <0 0x0acb3000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x0acb6000 0 0x4000>,
+ <0 0x0acba000 0 0x1000>,
+ <0 0x0acc4000 0 0x4000>,
+ <0 0x0acc8000 0 0x1000>;
+ reg-names = "csiphy0",
+ "csiphy1",
+ "csiphy2",
+ "vfe0",
+ "csid0",
+ "vfe1",
+ "csid1",
+ "vfe_lite",
+ "csid2";
---
bod
