On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:52:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:54:33AM +0100, pierre-henry.moussay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Pierre-Henry Moussay <pierre-henry.moussay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > PIC64GX SPI/QSPI are compatible with MPFS SPI/QSPI, just use > > fallback mechanism > > You've not copied me on the rest of the series so I don't know what's > going on with dependencies. When sending a patch series it is important > to ensure that all the various maintainers understand what the > relationship between the patches as the expecation is that there will be > interdependencies. Either copy everyone on the whole series or at least > copy them on the cover letter and explain what's going on. If there are > no strong interdependencies then it's generally simplest to just send > the patches separately to avoid any possible confusion. FWIW, you should be okay to take this, there's nothing that depends on this patch other than dts files and nothing that this patch depends on in turn.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
