On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 10:54:35AM +0100, pierre-henry.moussay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Pierre-Henry Moussay <pierre-henry.moussay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The PIC64GX use the same IP than MPFS, therefore add compatibility with > MPFS as fallback > > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Henry Moussay <pierre-henry.moussay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/sifive,ccache0.yaml | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/sifive,ccache0.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/sifive,ccache0.yaml > index 7e8cebe21584..9d064feb2ab1 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/sifive,ccache0.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/sifive,ccache0.yaml > @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ properties: > - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache > - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache > - const: cache > + - items: > + - const: microchip,pic64gx-ccache > + - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache > + - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache > + - const: cache > > cache-block-size: > const: 64 > @@ -93,6 +98,7 @@ allOf: > - starfive,jh7100-ccache > - starfive,jh7110-ccache > - microchip,mpfs-ccache > + - microchip,pic64gx-ccache Is this required? Shouldn't the fallback activate it? > > then: > properties: > -- > 2.30.2 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
