Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> I prefer these going through the omap tree. Like Eliad said,
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti does not get that many changes nowadays so the
>> chances of this patchset conflicting with something is very small.
>
> OK great. In that case no need to rearrange the patches, I can
> apply them into an immutable branch once the pending issues have
> been fixed if Kalle acks them.
>
> To avoid merge conflicts that branch is easiest done against
> v4.0-rc4. Kalle and Arnd, does that work for you guys?
>
> I can also base it on 5b7610f23562 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix wl12xx on
> dm3730-evm with mainline u-boot") that's on top of -rc2 plus few
> other fixes now merged to -rc4 mainline if we need a branch based
> on an earlier tag.

Sorry, it seems I forgot to answer this one:

Either baseline is good for me, I can't think of any problems with
either one. But please do remember that I'm a new maintainer, I might
very well miss something ;)

-- 
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux