On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 04:42:59PM +0800, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>
> On 9/25/24 00:00, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 01:42:01PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > > Il 24/09/24 12:31, Macpaul Lin ha scritto:
> > > > The display node in mt8195.dtsi was triggering a CHECK_DTBS error due
> > > > to an excessively long 'clocks' property:
> > > > display@14f06000: clocks: [[31, 14], [31, 43], [31, 44]] is too long
> > > >
> > > > To resolve this issue, add "maxItems: 3" to the 'clocks' property in
> > > > the DT schema.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 4ed545e7d100 ("dt-bindings: display: mediatek: disp: split each block to individual yaml")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,split.yaml | 1 +
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,split.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,split.yaml
> > > > index e4affc854f3d..42d2d483cc29 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,split.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,split.yaml
> > > > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ properties:
> > > > clocks:
> > > > items:
> > > > - description: SPLIT Clock
> > >
> > > That's at least confusing (granted that it works) - either add a description for
> > > each clock and then set `minItems: 1` (preferred), or remove this "SPLIT Clock"
> > > description and allow a maximum of 3 clocks.
> > >
> > > Removing the description can be done - IMO - because "SPLIT Clock" is, well,
> > > saying that the SPLIT block gets a SPLIT clock ... stating the obvious, anyway.
> >
> > Right, but what are the other two new clocks? Are they as obvious?
> > There's no clock-names here to give any more information as to what the
> > other clocks are supposed to be.
> >
> > Kinda unrelated, but I think that "SPLIT Clock" probably isn't what the
> > name of the clock in the IP block is anyway, sounds more like the name
> > for it on the provider end..
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. I think Moudy could help on the new fixes
> for both DT schem and mt8195.dtsi. This patch could be separated from
> origin patch set.
Not sure what you mean about separating it, if you mean correcting the
description for the split clock sure. The other stuff I mentioned needs
to be resolved before I'm willing to ack this.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
