On 19/09/2024 16:57, Abdellatif El Khlifi wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > >>>>> + '#extsys-id': >>>> >>>> '#' is not correct for sure, that's not a cell specifier. >>>> >>>> But anyway, we do not accept in general instance IDs. >>> >>> I'm happy to replace the instance ID with another solution. >>> In our case the remoteproc instance does not have a base address >>> to use. So, we can't put remoteproc@address >>> >>> What do you recommend in this case please ? >> >> Waiting one month to respond is a great way to drop all context from my >> memory. The emails are not even available for me - gone from inbox. >> >> Bus addressing could note it. Or you have different devices, so >> different compatibles. Tricky to say, because you did not describe the >> hardware really and it's one month later... >> > > Sorry for waiting. I was in holidays. > > I'll add more documentation about the external system for more clarity [1]. > > Basically, Linux runs on the Cortex-A35. The External system is a > Cortex-M core. The Cortex-A35 can not access the memory of the Cortex-M. > It can only control Cortex-M core using the reset control and status registers mapped > in the memory space of the Cortex-A35. That's pretty standard. It does not explain me why bus addressing or different compatible are not sufficient here. Best regards, Krzysztof
