Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: display: bridge: add sam9x75-mipi-dsi binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 03:16:53AM +0000, Manikandan.M@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> 
> On 14/08/24 7:29 pm, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 04:22:53PM +0530, Manikandan Muralidharan wrote:
> >> Add the 'sam9x75-mipi-dsi' compatible binding, which describes the
> >> Microchip's specific wrapper for the Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI HOST
> >> Controller for the sam9x75 series System-on-Chip (SoC) devices.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Manikandan Muralidharan<manikandan.m@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> changes in v3:
> >> - Describe the clocks used
> >>
> >> changes in v2:
> >> - List the clocks with description
> >> - remove describing 'remove-endpoint' properties
> >> - remove unused label, node and fix example DT indentation
> >> - cosmetic fixes
> >> ---
> >>   .../bridge/microchip,sam9x75-mipi-dsi.yaml    | 116 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 116 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/microchip,sam9x75-mipi-dsi.yaml
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/microchip,sam9x75-mipi-dsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/microchip,sam9x75-mipi-dsi.yaml
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..3c86f0cd49e9
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/microchip,sam9x75-mipi-dsi.yaml
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >> +%YAML 1.2
> >> +---
> >> +$id:http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bridge/microchip,sam9x75-mipi-dsi.yaml#
> >> +$schema:http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >> +
> >> +title: Microchip SAM9X75 MIPI DSI Controller
> >> +
> >> +maintainers:
> >> +  - Manikandan Muralidharan<manikandan.m@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> +
> >> +description:
> >> +  Microchip specific extensions or wrapper to the Synopsys Designware MIPI DSI.
> >> +  The MIPI Display Serial Interface (DSI) Host Controller implements all
> >> +  protocol functions defined in the MIPI DSI Specification.The DSI Host
> >> +  provides an interface between the LCD Controller (LCDC) and the MIPI D-PHY,
> >> +  allowing communication with a DSI-compliant display.
> >> +
> >> +allOf:
> >> +  - $ref: /schemas/display/dsi-controller.yaml#
> >> +
> >> +properties:
> >> +  compatible:
> >> +    const: microchip,sam9x75-mipi-dsi
> >> +
> >> +  reg:
> >> +    maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> +  clocks:
> >> +    items:
> >> +      - description:
> >> +          Peripheral Bus Clock between LCDC and MIPI DPHY
> >> +      - description:
> >> +          MIPI DPHY Interface reference clock for PLL block
> >> +
> >> +  clock-names:
> >> +    items:
> >> +      - const: pclk
> >> +      - const: refclk
> >> +
> >> +  microchip,sfr:
> >> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >> +    description:
> >> +      phandle to Special Function Register (SFR) node.To enable the DSI/CSI
> >> +      selection bit in SFR's ISS Configuration Register.
> > I'm curious - why is this phandle required? How many SFR nodes are there
> > on the platform?
> This phandle is to map the memory region of SFR node and configure the 
> DSI bit in the SFR's ISS configuration register.
> currently there is only one SFR node in this platform.

What does "currently" mean? The platform either has one or it does not,
currently makes it sound like it has more than one but the dts only has
one.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux