Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6397: move examples to parent PMIC mt6397

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6397: move examples to parent PMIC mt6397
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 09:01:10 +0200
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S . Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sen Chu <sen.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Chen Zhong <chen.zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rtc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sound@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bear Wang <bear.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pablo Sun <pablo.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Macpaul Lin <macpaul@xxxxxxxxx>, Chris-qj chen <chris-qj.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, MediaTek Chromebook Upstream <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240916151132.32321-3-macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>

On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 11:11:32PM +0800, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> Since the DT schema of multiple function PMIC mt6397 has been converted,
> move the examples in "mediatek,mt6397-regulator.yaml" to the parent schema
> "mediatek,mt6397.yaml".

Is there any error otherwise? Why this cannot stay here, since it is
already there?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6397: move examples to parent PMIC mt6397
  - From: Macpaul Lin

References:
- [PATCH v5 1/3] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6323: Convert to DT schema
  - From: Macpaul Lin
- [PATCH v5 3/3] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6397: move examples to parent PMIC mt6397
  - From: Macpaul Lin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: mfd: mediatek: mt6397: Convert to DT schema format
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: light: opt3001: add compatible for opt3002
Previous by thread: [PATCH v5 3/3] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6397: move examples to parent PMIC mt6397
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] regulator: dt-bindings: mt6397: move examples to parent PMIC mt6397
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Device Tree Compilter] [Device Tree Spec] [Linux Driver Backports] [Video for Linux] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux PCI Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Yosemite Backpacking]