On 16/09/2024 22:47, Diogo Silva wrote: > Hey, > > Sorry for the broken tag, will fix on a resend. > > As for the naming, if there is any reason for them to be named qm_* it's > totally fine, I'll revert it and only touch the clock names. I changed them It's just unnecessary. > because comparing with lvds1, those ones do not contain the qm_ prefix and > I don't see how this dtsi relates specifically to the imx8qm, since it is a > imx8-ss... and not imx8qm-ss... > I didn't quite get the question about the nodes. Could you elaborate? Thanks > Usually they have alphabetical order and your change does not look like keeping it. Best regards, Krzysztof
