On 16/09/2024 10:55, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 10:33:21AM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 13/09/2024 07:31, Taniya Das wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 8/17/2024 2:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 16/08/2024 10:32, Taniya Das wrote: >>>>> On the QCM6490 boards the LPASS firmware controls the complete clock >>>>> controller functionalities. But the LPASS resets are required to be >>>>> controlled from the high level OS. The Audio SW driver should be able to >>>>> assert/deassert the audio resets as required. Thus in clock driver add >>>>> support for the resets. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/clk/qcom/lpassaudiocc-sc7280.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- >>>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/lpassaudiocc-sc7280.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/lpassaudiocc-sc7280.c >>>>> index 45e726477086..b64393089263 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/lpassaudiocc-sc7280.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/lpassaudiocc-sc7280.c >>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ >>>>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only >>>>> /* >>>>> * Copyright (c) 2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. >>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. >>>>> */ >>>>> >>>>> #include <linux/clk-provider.h> >>>>> @@ -713,14 +714,24 @@ static const struct qcom_reset_map lpass_audio_cc_sc7280_resets[] = { >>>>> [LPASS_AUDIO_SWR_WSA_CGCR] = { 0xb0, 1 }, >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> +static const struct regmap_config lpass_audio_cc_sc7280_reset_regmap_config = { >>>>> + .name = "lpassaudio_cc_reset", >>>>> + .reg_bits = 32, >>>>> + .reg_stride = 4, >>>>> + .val_bits = 32, >>>>> + .fast_io = true, >>>>> + .max_register = 0xc8, >>>>> +}; >>>>> + >>>>> static const struct qcom_cc_desc lpass_audio_cc_reset_sc7280_desc = { >>>>> - .config = &lpass_audio_cc_sc7280_regmap_config, >>>>> + .config = &lpass_audio_cc_sc7280_reset_regmap_config, >>>>> .resets = lpass_audio_cc_sc7280_resets, >>>>> .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(lpass_audio_cc_sc7280_resets), >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> static const struct of_device_id lpass_audio_cc_sc7280_match_table[] = { >>>>> - { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-lpassaudiocc" }, >>>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,qcm6490-lpassaudiocc", .data = &lpass_audio_cc_reset_sc7280_desc }, >>>> >>>> That's odd to see sc7280 reset added for qcm6490, but not used fot >>>> sc7280 at all. Didn't you mean here lpass_audio_cc_qcm6409_desc? >>>> >>>> >>> The resets descriptor(lpass_audio_cc_reset_sc7280_desc) is not part of >>> the global clock descriptor(lpass_cc_sc7280_desc) as these are part of >>> different regmaps. >>> >>> On a non-QCM6490(SC7280) boards the resets are registered after the >>> global descriptor is registered. >>> >>> But on QCM6490 board we need to register only the reset descriptor and >>> no clocks are to be handled/registered and thus passed the match data >>> for QCM6490 boards only. >> >> Yeah, but why this is sc7280? > > Because it's more or less the same HW, different TZ and hyp firmware? > Hm, ok, probably I missed something from the context. Best regards, Krzysztof