On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:17:59PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Make sure dynamic ids do not interfere with fixed ones and let them > start after the highest fixed id. This patch might cause different > bus-numbers for dynamic ids, however it fixes a bug. Assume: > > - fixed id0 defers probe > - fixed id1 succeeds and registers a muxed bus with dynamic id > - muxed bus gets id0 > - fixed id0 wants to probe again, but its fixed id is gone now > - fixed id0 probe fails > > With this patch, the fixed ids are always reserved in the DT case. > For legacy board init, we already have a mechanism like this in > i2c_register_board_info(). > > Reported-by: Bob Feretich <bob.feretich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fixed the checkpatch warning and applied to for-next, thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
