On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 03:37:35PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 10:45 AM Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:40 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:00:08PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: ... > > > > +/** > > > > + * gpio_get_property_name_length - Returns the GPIO name length from a property name > > > > + * @propname: name of the property to check > > > > + * > > > > + * This function checks if the given property name matches the GPIO property > > > > + * patterns, and returns the length of the name of the GPIO. The pattern is > > > > + * "*-<GPIO suffix>" or just "<GPIO suffix>". > > > > + * > > > > + * Returns: > > > > + * The length of the string before '-<GPIO suffix>' if it matches > > > > + * "*-<GPIO suffix>", or 0 if no name part, just the suffix, or > > > > + * -EINVAL if the string doesn't match the pattern. > > > > > > Should be %-EINVAL as we agreed with Bart when I updated GPIOLIB kernel-doc. > > > > Ack. > > > > In the regulator cleanups I did, I used -%EINVAL instead. But then I > > realized that constants aren't really cross-referenced. I probably > > have to go through all of them to fix those up. > > FTR this patch ended up getting dropped from the series as it was no > longer needed. That's great news! > However if folks think there is still value in this patch, > I can still send a new version. Not for me, thanks. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
