Re: [RFC v1] dt-bindings: add IP versioning document for Microchip FPGAs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 08:45:06AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 05:00:40PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This is a pretty rough document I conjured up in 5 minutes, to document
> > my expectations for compatible strings for both our FPGA IP blocks and
> > reference designs that we ship, a la the one that exists for SiFive IPs.
> > There's been some internal conversations lately about this naming etc,
> > so good to have something written down.
> > 
> 
> You can try to make it a schema. Take a peak at:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml

Sure, I don't mind doing that - however given the breadth of microchip's
portfolio (and thus naming schemes) there may actually be little by way
of enforcement gained by making it into a binding. I'll give it a go and
see how permissive it ends up having to be.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux