Hi,
On 05/09/2024 14:11, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 06:50:48PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
Hi Tomi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 431c1646e1f86b949fa3685efc50b660a364c2b6]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tomi-Valkeinen/media-uapi-Add-meta-formats-for-PiSP-FE-config-and-stats/20240904-192729
base: 431c1646e1f86b949fa3685efc50b660a364c2b6
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904-rp1-cfe-v4-3-f1b5b3d69c81%40ideasonboard.com
patch subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] media: raspberrypi: Add support for RP1-CFE
config: m68k-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240905/202409051822.ZzUGw3XQ-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240905/202409051822.ZzUGw3XQ-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409051822.ZzUGw3XQ-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/media/platform/raspberrypi/rp1-cfe/cfe.c:2445:12: warning: 'cfe_runtime_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
2445 | static int cfe_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/media/platform/raspberrypi/rp1-cfe/cfe.c:2435:12: warning: 'cfe_runtime_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
2435 | static int cfe_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/cfe_runtime_resume +2445 drivers/media/platform/raspberrypi/rp1-cfe/cfe.c
The recommended way to fix this is to switch from SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS()
to RUNTIME_PM_OPS() and use pm_ptr() to set .driver.pm. This being said,
the driver won't work on a kernel with !CONFIG_PM given how you
implemented probe() and remove().
The pisp-be driver suffered from the same issue and Jacopo fixed it in
the last version. You can have a look at implement something similar.
I can't right away think of any reason to not just depend on CONFIG_PM
and be done with it without any tricks. Do you know if there's a reason?
Tomi
