On 07/09/2024 13:07, Barnabás Czémán wrote: > Add omit-battery-class property for avoid system create a battery device. This does not help much, basically repeats commit subject. You need to answer to "why?". > > Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq256xx.yaml | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq256xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq256xx.yaml > index a76afe3ca299..744f5782e8e7 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq256xx.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/bq256xx.yaml > @@ -62,6 +62,12 @@ properties: > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > description: phandle to the battery node being monitored > > + omit-battery-class: > + type: boolean > + description: | > + If this property is set, the operating system does not try to create a > + battery device. You described the desired Linux feature or behavior, not the actual hardware. The bindings are about the latter, so instead you need to rephrase the property and its description to match actual hardware capabilities/features/configuration etc. Best regards, Krzysztof
