Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Fix interrupt type of camss interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/09/2024 17:41, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
The expected type of all CAMSS interrupts is edge rising, fix it in
the CAMSS device tree node for sc8280xp platform.

Fixes: 5994dd60753e ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: camss: Add CAMSS block definition")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi | 40 +++++++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
index 80a57aa22839..aa2678eb3bcd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8280xp.dtsi
@@ -3882,26 +3882,26 @@ camss: camss@ac5a000 {
  				    "vfe3",
  				    "csid3";
- interrupts = <GIC_SPI 359 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 360 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 448 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 464 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 465 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 466 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 467 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 468 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 469 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 477 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 478 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 479 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 640 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 641 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 758 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 759 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 760 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 761 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 762 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
-				     <GIC_SPI 764 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 359 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 360 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 448 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 464 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 465 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 466 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 467 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 468 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 469 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 477 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 478 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 479 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 640 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 641 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 758 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 759 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 760 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 761 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 762 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 764 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
  			interrupt-names = "csid1_lite",
  					  "vfe_lite1",
  					  "csiphy3",

Yep, downstream defines these as rising.

Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux