Hi Konrad,
On 9/5/2024 9:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 3.09.2024 8:21 AM, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>> Use "num-banks" property to indicate the actual num of banks for
>> errata.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
>> index 8fa4ffd3a9b5..3fb45e625d82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/llcc-qcom.c
>> @@ -1275,12 +1275,17 @@ static int qcom_llcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto err;
>> cfg = &cfgs->llcc_config[cfg_index];
>>
>> - ret = regmap_read(regmap, cfg->reg_offset[LLCC_COMMON_STATUS0], &num_banks);
>> - if (ret)
>> - goto err;
>> + if (unlikely(!of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "num-banks", &num_banks))) {
>> + /* errata: get num of llcc banks. */
>> + } else {
>> + ret = regmap_read(regmap, cfg->reg_offset[LLCC_COMMON_STATUS0], &num_banks);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err;
>> +
>> + num_banks &= LLCC_LB_CNT_MASK;
>> + num_banks >>= LLCC_LB_CNT_SHIFT;
>> + }
>
> Is num-banks going to be populated by the bootloader, or hardcoded?
>
> If the latter, we may just do so in the driver, hoping no more SoCs
> have this erratum..
>
> Konrad
We would like modify that in driver instead of bootloader, so you suggestion
is hardcode it in struct like "qcom_llcc_config" instead of adding property
in devicetree? Please correct my if there is misunderstanding.
Thanks,
Jingyi
