Hi Lubomir,
On 15-03-17 10:27 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Eric Anholt wrote:
From: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Craig McGeachie <slapdau@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Split into a separate patch for submitting to the devicetree list.
Consistently start node docs with a capital letter. device's
address in the example shouldn't have "0x". Drop machine-specific
interrupt numbers from the docs. (changes by anholt).
v3: Move the file to just bcm2835-mbox.txt, clean up formatting
(changes by anholt, from review by Lee Jones).
Thanks for fixing up.
.../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/bcm2835-mbox.txt | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/bcm2835-mbox.txt
I don't see any unruliness or causes of controversy.
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/bcm2835-mbox.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/bcm2835-mbox.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0bb2b9d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/bcm2835-mbox.txt
I am trying to standarize all broadcom device tree bindings in the
format "brcm,binding.txt".
Could you please rename this file to brcm,bcm2835-mbox.txt for
consistency in bindings?
Regards,
Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
