On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 11:14:58AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 8:10 AM Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > I guess I'd have to see how the code looks to know for sure, but if I > understand it sounds a little awkward. Specifically, the "options" > sound like they might become complicated enough that you're inventing > your own little programming language (with delays, abilities to drive > pins low and high, abilities to turn on/off clocks, and abilities to > turn off/on regulators) and then probers need to code up their > programs in this language. You beat me up to it. I have the same thought. However, what is described is exactly what a regular PMIC has. They already have their own language for exactly this purposes. (At least I see that in a few Intel SoC-based platforms.) So, after all it may be not a bad idea But would be good to have it standardized (if it's even possible :-). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
