On Thu Sep 5, 2024 at 1:39 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/09/2024 13:32, Dragan Simic wrote: > > Sprinkle a few commonly used aliases onto the PineTab2 dtsi file, to improve > > its readability a bit, to make it easier to refer to the actual nodes later, > > if needed, and to add a bit more detail to some of the labels. > > > > Suggested-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Unused aliases do not improve readability, so for me this change is > making code worse without valid reason. This came forth by a question from me to Dragan about a patch for another board which doesn't have a charger defined at all (yet). I actually have that patch (but not the HW) for a while (~1.5 year) now and I had used `rk817_charger: charger` for that, probably because I saw that being used everywhere else. Then I compared it to the PineTab2 and noticed it had only `charger`, so I asked "What should I use? With or without the alias?" In this case the inconsistency is causing confusion (with me). So: What should be used for that other/new board(s)? Cheers, Diederik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
