[PATCH can-next v5 10/20] can: rockchip_canfd: rkcanfd_register_done(): add warning for erratum 5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tests on the rk3568v2 and rk3568v3 show that a reduced "baudclk" (e.g.
80MHz, compared to the standard 300MHz) significantly increases the
possibility of incorrect FIFO counters, i.e. erratum 5.

Print an info message if the clock is below the known good value of
300MHz.

Tested-by: Alibek Omarov <a1ba.omarov@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c b/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c
index 40911bb63623..d6c0f2fe8d2b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c
@@ -738,6 +738,13 @@ static void rkcanfd_register_done(const struct rkcanfd_priv *priv)
 		    FIELD_GET(RKCANFD_REG_RTL_VERSION_MAJOR, dev_id),
 		    FIELD_GET(RKCANFD_REG_RTL_VERSION_MINOR, dev_id),
 		    priv->devtype_data.quirks);
+
+	if (priv->devtype_data.quirks & RKCANFD_QUIRK_RK3568_ERRATUM_5 &&
+	    priv->can.clock.freq < RKCANFD_ERRATUM_5_SYSCLOCK_HZ_MIN)
+		netdev_info(priv->ndev,
+			    "Erratum 5: CAN clock frequency (%luMHz) lower than known good (%luMHz), expect degraded performance\n",
+			    priv->can.clock.freq / MEGA,
+			    RKCANFD_ERRATUM_5_SYSCLOCK_HZ_MIN / MEGA);
 }
 
 static int rkcanfd_register(struct rkcanfd_priv *priv)

-- 
2.45.2






[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux