Hi Heiko, On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:59:12PM GMT, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Dienstag, 3. September 2024, 18:47:17 CEST schrieb Andi Shyti: > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:59:34AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 3 September 2024 11:46:00 EDT Andi Shyti wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:22:33AM GMT, Detlev Casanova wrote: > > > > > Just like RK356x and RK3588, RK3576 is compatible to the existing > > > > > rk3399 binding. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > I will apply this after 1 and 2 have been merged. > > > > > > Sure, although it is not really dependent on 1 and 2. > > > > yes, but I want to be sure that everything is coming in. > > > > > > BTW, who is maintaining rockchip.yaml? > > > > > > Heiko Stuebner is the maintainer of Rockchip SoC support. > > > > I would guess so, but I think we should also add the entry to > > the maintainer's file :-) > > now you made me doubt the wildcards we have in place ;-) > > # scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml > [...] > Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/Rockchip SoC support) > [...] > linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support) > > So Maintainers seems to be correct ... *phew* :-) Normally I check the MAINTAINERS file where the rockchip.yaml is not listed. There is an "N: rockchip" under your name, but having it explicitely stated wouldn't hurt (as it is in other arm/*yaml file. That's why I got confused at first. Anyway, sorry for the noise. Thanks, Andi
