Re: AW: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: Introduce ADS71x8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/2/24 09:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 02/09/2024 15:48, Sperling, Tobias wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:49:53AM +0000, Sperling, Tobias wrote:
>From b2e04ce5500faf274654be5284be9db4f3abefce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001

Some junk ^^^ above. Please investigate how you send patches.

Yeah also saw this line, but of course tried to apply the patch again after sending it
as mail and that worked fine. But just checked again and seems like this line can be
dropped.
And yes, I sent the patches manually, as we likely have some restrictions for smtp,
but as I was able to apply them again it's fine I guess.

From: Tobias Sperling <tobias.sperling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:08:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: Introduce ADS71x8

And all this suggests malformed patch.

Why? If I drop this I'm not able to apply the patch, so I think this should be fine.

OK, it works with b4, but seeing duplicated subject is not expected and
might not work with all tools.



Add documentation for the driver of ADS7128 and ADS7138 12-bit, 8-channel
analog-to-digital converters. These ADCs have a wide operating range and
a wide feature set. Communication is based on an I2C interface.
The driver provides the functionality of manually reading single channels
or sequentially reading all channels automatically.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Sperling <tobias.sperling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,ads71x8.yaml |  85 +++++++++++
  Documentation/hwmon/ads71x8.rst               | 140 ++++++++++++++++++
  Documentation/hwmon/index.rst                 |   1 +

Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Then please
run  and (probably) fix more warnings.
Some warnings can be ignored, especially from --strict run, but the code
here looks like it needs a fix. Feel free to get in touch if the warning
is not clear.

Had done this already before submitting the patches (at least without --strict),
but only reports a warning about splitting the patch (which I got wrong here)
and updating the maintainers.
I guess you were about suggesting a second script to run. Which one is that?

Please split the patches.


I suspect you may have to be more specific. There need to be two patches
in Documentation/, one with the bindings and another one with the driver
documentation.

Thanks,
Guenter





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux