Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] iio: backend: extend features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jonathan,

thanks for the feedbacks,

On 31/08/24 1:23 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:32:00 +0200
Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Extend backend features with new calls needed later on this
patchset from axi version of ad3552r.

A bus type property has been added to the devicetree to
inform the backend about the type of bus (interface) in use
bu the IP.

The follwoing calls are added:

iio_backend_ext_sync_enable
	enable synchronize channels on external trigger
iio_backend_ext_sync_disable
	disable synchronize channels on external trigger
iio_backend_ddr_enable
	enable ddr bus transfer
iio_backend_ddr_disable
	disable ddr bus transfer
iio_backend_set_bus_mode
	select the type of bus, so that specific read / write
	operations are performed accordingly
iio_backend_buffer_enable
	enable buffer
iio_backend_buffer_disable
	disable buffer
iio_backend_data_transfer_addr
	define the target register address where the DAC sample
	will be written.
iio_backend_bus_reg_read
	generic bus read, bus-type dependent
iio_backend_bus_read_write
	generic bus write, bus-type dependent

Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/iio/backend.h        |  24 ++++++
  2 files changed, 175 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
index a52a6b61c8b5..1f60c8626be7 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
@@ -718,6 +718,157 @@ static int __devm_iio_backend_get(struct device *dev, struct iio_backend *back)
  	return 0;
  }

+
+/**
+ * iio_backend_buffer_enable - Enable data buffering
Data buffering is a very vague term.  Perhaps some more detail on what
this means?

for this DAC IP, it is the dma buffer where i write the samples,
for other non-dac frontends may be something different, so i kept it
generic. Not sure what a proper name may be, maybe

"Enable optional data buffer" ?


+ * @back: Backend device
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
+ */
+int iio_backend_buffer_enable(struct iio_backend *back)
+{
+	return iio_backend_op_call(back, buffer_enable);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_buffer_enable, IIO_BACKEND);
+
+/**

+ * iio_backend_set_buffer_disable - Disable data buffering
+ * @back: Backend device
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
+ */
+int iio_backend_buffer_disable(struct iio_backend *back)
+{
+	return iio_backend_op_call(back, buffer_disable);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_buffer_disable, IIO_BACKEND);
+
+/**
+ * iio_backend_buffer_transfer_addr - Set data address.
+ * @back: Backend device
+ * @chan_address: Channel register address
Run scripts/kernel-doc on this and fix the errors (parameter name is
wrong).  W=1 builds might also point the simpler ones out.
ack, done
+ *
+ * Some devices may need to inform the backend about an address/location
+ * where to read or write the data.
I'd drop the 'location' part unless this gets used later because you
are referring register address above.

ack, done


+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
+ */
+int iio_backend_data_transfer_addr(struct iio_backend *back, u32 address)
+{
+	return iio_backend_op_call(back, data_transfer_addr, address);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_data_transfer_addr, IIO_BACKEND);
+
+/**
+ * iio_backend_bus_reg_read - Read from the interface bus
+ * @back: Backend device
+ * @reg: Register valule
+ * @val: Pointer to register value
+ * @size: Size, in bytes
+ *
+ * A backend may operate on a specific interface with a related bus.
+ * Read from the interface bus.
So this is effectively routing control plane data through the offloaded
bus?  That sounds a lot more like a conventional bus than IIO backend.
Perhaps it should be presented as that with the IIO device attached
to that bus? I don't fully understand what is wired up here.

Mainly, an IP may include a bus as 16bit parallel, or LVDS, or similar
to QSPI as in my case (ad3552r).

In particular, the bus is physically as a QSPI bus, but the data format
over it is a bit different.

So ad3552r needs this 5 lanes bus + double data rate to reach 33MUPS.

https://analogdevicesinc.github.io/hdl/library/axi_ad3552r/index.html


+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
+ */
+int iio_backend_bus_reg_read(struct iio_backend *back,
+			     u32 reg, void *val, size_t size)
+{
+	if (!size)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return iio_backend_op_call(back, bus_reg_read, reg, val, size);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_bus_reg_read, IIO_BACKEND);
+

Thanks a lot,

regards,
Angelo


--
 ,,,      Angelo Dureghello
:: :.     BayLibre -runtime team- Developer
:`___:
 `____:





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux